Why tell you this. Well on his blog he has a syndicate section with all the usual RSS stuff. But he also has the following:
How do I feel about syndication? A long time ago Jeffrey Zeldman said something to this effect:
Q: If you offered an RSS feed, I could read your stuff without visiting your site.
A: If you stored your groceries on the sidewalk, we could eat your food without sitting across the table from you.
I’m not going to force you to, but come sit at my table and we can have jolly good time. There is so much on this site that by its very nature will never be available in syndicated format. Come for the words, stay for the pictures, jazz quotes, and useless contemporia.
Does that make me want to cut my feeds or hack them back so that you need to visit the site to read the full story. No. I know it’s an important way to consume information. But when many MSM organisatiosn are re-positioning themselves as the community hub – the big dinner table- it does make me think. Especially if, as some have predicted, the homepage is dead.
We need to work a little harder at how our RSS feeds work.
Really simple serendipity
One of the joys of a newspaper is the serendipity of news. For every story we want to read we may find one we didn’t know about that is equally interesting.
Feeds aren’t like that. They are usually automated, organised and published with structure in mind. I get a news feed or a specific sports feed.
Perhaps what we need to do is start peppering our news feeds with other content. maybe we just need to syndicate everything ? I’m not sure.
I think our news feeds need to stay organised (that’s how people use them) but maybe they are too much about the contents of our fridge at the moment. Maybe we need to think of them more like menus with free samples (and before the word free is misinterpreted, no that doesn’t mean I support pay walls) to entice people in to sit at our tables.
That means we need to know even more about our audience. After all you don’t want just anyone eating at your table.